very true, Tim, which one were you talking about ?
--
Wouter Zoons - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.andromda.org/
_
Reply to the post : http://galaxy.andromda.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1955#1955
Posting to http://forum.andromda.org/ is preferr
Quote:
also, we need to remain 1.4 compatible .. perhaps using retroweaver
(end of quote)
However, generating generics vs using them in AndroMDA are different
issues...we could generate code with generics and not use them in the AndroMDA
codebase itself.
--
Chad Brandon - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
also, we need to remain 1.4 compatible .. perhaps using retroweaver
--
Wouter Zoons - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.andromda.org/
_
Reply to the post : http://galaxy.andromda.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1951#1951
Posting to http://forum.andromd
Yeah we've talked about it a bit, but nothing concrete. There was a post
related to this on the forum a little while ago:
http://galaxy.andromda.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=138&highlight=generics
--
Chad Brandon - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.andromda.org
there's an issue for it here:
but that's about it :-)
--
Wouter Zoons - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.andromda.org/
_
Reply to the post : http://galaxy.andromda.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1949#1949
Posting to http://forum.andromda.org/ is
How are we going to use Generics with AndroMDA? Has anyone tackled that yet?
A Collection is not just a Collection anymore. It could be a
Collection or Collection and the compiler and Eclipse
will complain if you are not explicite about it.
___
