Re: [Angstrom-devel] Angstrom on AT91SAM9261EK

2007-12-13 Thread Nicolas Ferre
CK Sim [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, I have successfully tested the Angstrom distribution (from www.linux4sam.org http://www.linux4sam.org/ ) on the EK board and it works fine. However, I encountered a problem when using it on a custom board with a 800x480 7 LCD display. I recompiled

Re: [Angstrom-devel] [oe-commits] org.oe.dev angstrom 2007 preferred versions: bump midori to 0.13 to get it built against a recent webkit

2007-12-13 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 koen commit schreef: conf/distro/include/angstrom-2007-preferred-versions.inc -PREFERRED_VERSION_midori ?= 0.0.12 +PREFERRED_VERSION_midori ?= 0.0.13 - -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] will go go away in december 2007, please use [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead.

[Angstrom-devel] Angstrom on AT91SAM9261EK

2007-12-13 Thread CK Sim
Hi Nicolas, I have noted the patch that includes the statement -screen 240x320 in Xserver configuration file. I did try to modify that to -screen 800x480 for my LCD display of 800x480 but it did not seem to work either. Another issue observed is that the gpe-dm executes (as seen on console

Re: [Angstrom-devel] [RFC] Standardized Linux-based 2nd-stage bootloader

2007-12-13 Thread Cliff Brake
On Dec 12, 2007 8:54 PM, Paul Sokolovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, based on the above functionality, I'd like to propose it as a default bootloading solution for Angstrom, or at least as the default solution for PocketPC- and Palm-based devices. Sounds good! Cliff --