Re: [Angstrom-devel] QemuArm version of Angstrom stable (SOLVED)

2008-01-11 Thread Fernando de Francisco
Finally, I've found how to avoid the crashing of GPE File /etc/matchbox/session Change line: -e exec matchbox-window-manager -use_cursor yes $@ to this one: exec matchbox-window-manager -use_cursor yes $@ and will work. I've not found what this '-e' does. If I'm wrong, please let me know

[Angstrom-devel] [Review] echo -e fixes

2008-01-11 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Various people are getting bitten by the 'echo -e' usage in e.g. gpe-session scripts (the x11-keeps-crashing problems), so I'd like to have a6a229a30536ec1d025937b05457059b0bf4b55d in the stable branch:

Re: [Angstrom-devel] QemuArm version of Angstrom stable (SOLVED)

2008-01-11 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Fernando de Francisco schreef: | Finally, I've found how to avoid the crashing of GPE | | File /etc/matchbox/session | | Change line: | -e exec matchbox-window-manager -use_cursor yes $@ | to this one: | exec matchbox-window-manager -use_cursor yes $@

Re: [Angstrom-devel] RFC: Update linux-rp 2.6.23 to latest rev and make it the default for poodle

2008-01-11 Thread Ashley J Gittins
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, Richard Purdie wrote: Whether it makes sense for angstrom stable, it isn't my place to say. I can say that 2.6.17 is removed, I won't be touching it again and 2.6.23 is the future though ;-). Hi Richard, Not sure if this is relevant but collie still requires 2.6.21

Re: [Angstrom-devel] update to angstrom-2007-preferred-versions.inc

2008-01-11 Thread Paul Sokolovsky
Hello Koen, Friday, January 11, 2008, 9:40:46 AM, you wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rolf Leggewie schreef: | Koen Kooi schrieb: | Sounds ok, +1 from me. | | c6c33aa5d673dccd6d19de32e40edd19565dbb5a it is, then. Added to BACKPORTS.txt, it still needs an ACK from a

[Angstrom-devel] Tosa status pages

2008-01-11 Thread Dmitry Baryshkov
Hi, I've put few pages regarding my current efforts in cleaning up/merging upstream support for tosa (SL-6000). They are available at http://tosa.lumag.spb.ru/ As usual comments are welcome. -- With best wishes Dmitry ___ Angstrom-distro-devel

Re: [Angstrom-devel] RFC: add opie-image to autobuilder

2008-01-11 Thread Paul Sokolovsky
Hello Paul, Thursday, January 10, 2008, 9:32:11 PM, you wrote: [] For now I am happy to just do as you say and rip out that stuff from opie-image.bb. I will prepare a patch for that this weekend if nobody else gets to it before me. Ok, I did ;-). Pushed. Cheers, Paul -- Best

Re: [Angstrom-devel] update to angstrom-2007-preferred-versions.inc

2008-01-11 Thread José Bernardo Bandos Rodrigues
Another update proposal, navit - the default version doesn't build, the 0.0.3 version builds perfectly: NOTE: Resolving missing task queue dependencies ERROR: No providers of runtime build target speechd (for ['/home/jbs/oe/org.openembedded.angstrom-2007.12-stable

Re: [Angstrom-devel] [oe] mtn disapprove

2008-01-11 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rolf Leggewie schreef: | It seems this solution is not yet perfect. All of the sudden, bitbake | cooks up an armv5te version of libogg for the collie. My suspicion is | that this has to do with PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS. | | What does PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS

Re: [Angstrom-devel] update to angstrom-2007-preferred-versions.inc

2008-01-11 Thread Junqian Gordon Xu
On 01/11/2008 07:38 AM, José Bernardo Bandos Rodrigues wrote: Another update proposal, navit - the default version doesn't build, the 0.0.3 version builds perfectly: The navit package and speech-dispatch (speechd) have seen quite a few PR bumps since the stable branch was tagged. Although

[Angstrom-devel] Opie Machines

2008-01-11 Thread Ian Bonham
I've just had a quick look at the patch file, and I am guessing Spitz will not be a machine included in the Opie image builds, is this correct? I was hoping to get Opie in test on my machine, but am having a break from BitBake et all at the moment, as getting a working environment I could build

Re: [Angstrom-devel] update to angstrom-2007-preferred-versions.inc

2008-01-11 Thread Junqian Gordon Xu
On 01/11/2008 01:12 PM, Paul Sokolovsky wrote: But don't forget to RFC it once you think stuff in .dev stabilized I just pushed a navit commit. Hope everything is in line now. I will let it sit for a couple days for me or CoreDump to test, then we will RFC for the stable branch. Regards

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Opie Machines

2008-01-11 Thread Paul Sokolovsky
Hello Ian, Friday, January 11, 2008, 8:04:30 PM, you wrote: I've just had a quick look at the patch file, and I am guessing Spitz will not be a machine included in the Opie image builds, is this correct? I was hoping to get Opie in test on my machine, but am having a break from BitBake et

Re: [Angstrom-devel] [oe] [RFC] Smallscreen mod for GtkFileChooser

2008-01-11 Thread Paul Sokolovsky
Hello Michael, Thursday, January 10, 2008, 1:08:41 PM, you wrote: Paul Sokolovsky wrote: I would like to raise the original proposal: to apply my patch, at least to Angstrom stable branch. Of course, I'd prefer .dev to keep in sync too, but if there're concerns that applying such patch

Re: [Angstrom-devel] RFC: add opie-image to autobuilder

2008-01-11 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Sokolovsky schreef: | Hello Paul, | | Thursday, January 10, 2008, 1:10:05 PM, you wrote: | | Hi there, | | Attached is a patch to add Opie to the autobuilder script. It adds a separate | block to build opie-image for just those machines that are

Re: [Angstrom-devel] RFC: add opie-image to autobuilder

2008-01-11 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008, Koen Kooi wrote: This first batch of opie images is being uploaded by the 2007 autobuilder. Great, I see they have appeared (in unstable/autobuild/ for those who are unfamiliar with the Angstrom website structure as I was a short time ago). So should I copy these to