Hi
I would like build a recipe for a icon theme (for matchbox apps),
there's not compilation process, only a file copy. How can I do it to
create this recipe and include it on angstrom feed?
Thanks for your time.
___
Angstrom-distro-devel mailing
Hello,
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 02:25:43 +0100
Michal Panczyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tested it by hand I play with different kernel (non-bootable) so
can not tell right now if it works or not.
But:
1) previous entry for r4 was wrong
2) r4 image was unbootable - setting manually root to
Hello,
So, no objections? I'll add it then, and RFC adding to stable branch
too. I'd like to keep that extra check for ANGSTROM_MODE being set - it
at least consistent with existing MACHINE check.
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:52:42 +0200
Paul Sokolovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[]
It's pretty
Hello,
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 23:26:32 -0500
Junqian Gordon Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In response to user request (oebug 3468), I'd like to propose to
provide fuse kernel module for all zaurus machines (i.e.
CONFIG_FUSE_FS=m).
Currently tosa and collie have that line set in defconfig. So
Is there a protocol for submitting new/updated bb files to the bugtracker
(eg, importance markings, etc)? Or is there a better place to submit them?
Thanks.
___
Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 13:11 +0200, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
So, no objections? I'll add it then, and RFC adding to stable branch
too. I'd like to keep that extra check for ANGSTROM_MODE being set - it
at least consistent with existing MACHINE check.
See below.
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:52:42
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Sokolovsky schreef:
| Hello,
|
| This adds support for kexec and jffs2, as was discussed recently on the
| list.
Looks OK to me, but doesn't this also need the klibc fixes Thomas K. did?
regards,
KOen
|
Hello,
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 20:09:03 +0100
Koen Kooi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Sokolovsky schreef:
| Hello,
|
| This adds support for kexec and jffs2, as was discussed recently on
the | list.
Looks OK to me, but doesn't this also need
As invoked in the other discussion about the landmark for closing bug, I
think the current process of getting fixes from .dev -- stable -- feed
leaves a lot to be desired. Here is my 2 cents.
1. We should make the process as transparent as possible to everybody
(even users, so they will hate
