Koen Kooi wrote:
I think going back to the good-old dumping untested stuff in releases
I would vote for it.
would actually be an improvement over the current mentor apathy.
I have only one spitz (terrier) machine and I want to have it usable.
Testing new image needs a lot of time for
Stanislav Brabec wrote:
I build my own tree for my experiments (see link below). I can
eventually upload my images
No, only an autobuilder may upload images, anything else is a QA nightmare.
regards,
Koen
___
Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 3:41 AM, Stanislav Brabec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have only one spitz (terrier) machine and I want to have it usable.
Testing new image needs a lot of time for re-customizing them for my
needs. That is why I don't volunteer to become a spitz mentor.
I still have my
On Wednesday 03 September 2008, Koen Kooi wrote:
I think going back to the good-old dumping untested stuff in releases
would actually be an improvement over the current mentor apathy.
Having just had a response from Paul S. it would seem that all of his machines
are no longer mentored either
I'm lost!
I've got my SL-C3000 useable (Thanks Stanislav!), but how many machines is
Angstrom trying to support now?
I just get the feeling at the moment that Angstrom is a build of
OpenEmbedded, and that build seems to be forking in many directions. I look
at the feeds and see some software