Re: [Angstrom-devel] Machine mentors for h5000, c7x0, spitz, tosa

2008-09-04 Thread Stanislav Brabec
Koen Kooi wrote: I think going back to the good-old dumping untested stuff in releases  I would vote for it. would actually be an improvement over the current mentor apathy. I have only one spitz (terrier) machine and I want to have it usable. Testing new image needs a lot of time for

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Machine mentors for h5000, c7x0, spitz, tosa

2008-09-04 Thread Koen Kooi
Stanislav Brabec wrote: I build my own tree for my experiments (see link below). I can eventually upload my images No, only an autobuilder may upload images, anything else is a QA nightmare. regards, Koen ___ Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Machine mentors for h5000, c7x0, spitz, tosa

2008-09-04 Thread Shawn Rutledge
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 3:41 AM, Stanislav Brabec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have only one spitz (terrier) machine and I want to have it usable. Testing new image needs a lot of time for re-customizing them for my needs. That is why I don't volunteer to become a spitz mentor. I still have my

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Machine mentors for h5000, c7x0, spitz, tosa

2008-09-04 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Wednesday 03 September 2008, Koen Kooi wrote: I think going back to the good-old dumping untested stuff in releases would actually be an improvement over the current mentor apathy. Having just had a response from Paul S. it would seem that all of his machines are no longer mentored either

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Machine mentors for h5000, c7x0, spitz, tosa

2008-09-04 Thread Ian Bonham
I'm lost! I've got my SL-C3000 useable (Thanks Stanislav!), but how many machines is Angstrom trying to support now? I just get the feeling at the moment that Angstrom is a build of OpenEmbedded, and that build seems to be forking in many directions. I look at the feeds and see some software