Re: [Angstrom-devel] Initramfs masterplan proposal

2008-10-29 Thread Andrea Adami
1) deploy kernel in /boot (at least for zaurus-2.6.inc or in machine.conf) +# uncomment to build initramfs-kexecboot kernel +#require conf/machine/include/kexecboot.inc Can't this be done without changes to machine.conf? Actually the deployment is blocked in zaurus-2.6.inc 79 # Don't

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Initramfs masterplan proposal

2008-10-29 Thread Grigorios Prasinos
Thomas Kunze (Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 08:08:06PM +0100): Andrea Adami wrote: Seeinfg it from a biased Zaurus-centric perspective, there have been some progresses: the kexecboot part has been committed (thx thesing for partially closing 4688). Only a minor fix remains to do (doing kexec, screen

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Initramfs masterplan proposal

2008-10-29 Thread Koen Kooi
On 29-10-2008 10:32, Andrea Adami wrote: 1) deploy kernel in /boot (at least for zaurus-2.6.inc or in machine.conf) +# uncomment to build initramfs-kexecboot kernel +#require conf/machine/include/kexecboot.inc Can't this be done without changes to machine.conf? Actually the deployment is

[Angstrom-devel] [RFC] Turning on thumb for armv4t machines

2008-10-29 Thread Koen Kooi
Hi, Some years ago Graeme and I looked at using thumb and weren't really impressed with the space savings, but lately Phil has been fixing a lot of stuff in OE: http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2008-October/006718.html Since armv4t machines are cache-starved and don't