I wonder why angstrom pins toolchain to linaro version. Especially
* there is no hint where to get linaro toolchain
* if no linaro toolchain is found oe-core' default suggestion for
gcc's version is overridden and gcc 5 is used causing strange trouble
at least for meta-fsl kernels.
Could we stop
On May 20, 2015, at 1:05 AM, Andreas Müller schnitzelt...@googlemail.com
wrote:
I wonder why angstrom pins toolchain to linaro version. Especially
* there is no hint where to get linaro toolchain
* if no linaro toolchain is found oe-core' default suggestion for
gcc's version is
On May 20, 2015, at 12:06 PM, Trevor Woerner twoer...@gmail.com wrote:
Commit8f0df794f289c0ffcc30fe77d19c5f1880f05f0c makes it necessary for
the meta-qt5 layer to be available since it contains
classes/populate_sdk_qt5.bbclass. Was this intentional? If so the README
file should include
Commit8f0df794f289c0ffcc30fe77d19c5f1880f05f0c makes it necessary for
the meta-qt5 layer to be available since it contains
classes/populate_sdk_qt5.bbclass. Was this intentional? If so the README
file should include this dependency.