Re: [Angstrom-devel] [meta-angstrom][fido] linux-yocto: remove orphaned bbappend for version 3.10

On 05.05.2015 09:41, Koen Kooi wrote: > >> Op 4 mei 2015, om 11:38 heeft Steffen Sledz het >> volgende geschreven: >> >> Signed-off-by: Steffen Sledz >> --- >> recipes-tweaks/linux/linux-yocto_3.10.bbappend | 21 - >> 1 file c

[Angstrom-devel] [meta-angstrom][fido] linux-yocto: remove orphaned bbappend for version 3.10

Signed-off-by: Steffen Sledz --- recipes-tweaks/linux/linux-yocto_3.10.bbappend | 21 - 1 file changed, 21 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 recipes-tweaks/linux/linux-yocto_3.10.bbappend diff --git a/recipes-tweaks/linux/linux-yocto_3.10.bbappend b/recipes-tweaks/linux

Re: [Angstrom-devel] [fido] orphaned bbappend in meta-angstrom

On 30.04.2015 08:07, Steffen Sledz wrote: > The angstrom-v2015.06-yocto1.8 branch of meta-angstrom contains > recipes-tweaks/linux/linux-yocto_3.10.bbappend. But the fido branch of > openembedded-core does not have a recipe for linux-yocto_3.10 (just 3.14 and > 3.19). > &g

[Angstrom-devel] [fido] orphaned bbappend in meta-angstrom

The angstrom-v2015.06-yocto1.8 branch of meta-angstrom contains recipes-tweaks/linux/linux-yocto_3.10.bbappend. But the fido branch of openembedded-core does not have a recipe for linux-yocto_3.10 (just 3.14 and 3.19). So the bbappend should be removed or updated. Regards, Steffen -- DResear

Re: [Angstrom-devel] meta-angstrom commit 75f0f25e breaks build of opencv from meta-openembedded

On 10.03.2015 14:50, Koen Kooi wrote: > >> Op 9 mrt. 2015, om 12:52 heeft Steffen Sledz het >> volgende geschreven: >> >> Commit 75f0f25e55f0745a011640b5c81d88be99366f45 in >> meta-angstrom/recipes-tweaks (branch angstrom-v2014.12-yocto1.7) introduces >

[Angstrom-devel] meta-angstrom commit 75f0f25e breaks build of opencv from meta-openembedded

Commit 75f0f25e55f0745a011640b5c81d88be99366f45 in meta-angstrom/recipes-tweaks (branch angstrom-v2014.12-yocto1.7) introduces version 10.5 of libav. This version does no longer provide defines like CODEC_ID_H264 which are needed for opencv 2.4.9 from meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support (b

[Angstrom-devel] No recipe for recipes-tweaks/qt5/qtbase_5.2.1.bbappend

We're currently switching to th daisy branches. According to [1] meta-angstrom depends on openembedded-core, meta-oe, and meta-systemd layers. The angstrom-v2014.06-yocto1.6 branch of meta-angstrom contains recipes-tweaks/qt5/qtbase_5.2.1.bbappend. But there's no qtbase recipe in the required

Re: [Angstrom-devel] preferred version 03b21-2.1.8 of openjdk-7-jre not available

On 14.01.2014 13:08, Koen Kooi wrote: > > Op 14 jan. 2014, om 09:23 heeft Steffen Sledz het > volgende geschreven: > >> Hi Ångström-Maintainers, >> >> because of a build issue[1] we were forced to update the meta-java layer to >> the latest version 9dfb

[Angstrom-devel] preferred version 03b21-2.1.8 of openjdk-7-jre not available

Hi Ångström-Maintainers, because of a build issue[1] we were forced to update the meta-java layer to the latest version 9dfb7ecb87e67052e94641d6e02907c582264217. Unfortunately this version does no longer provide the java versions preferred by the current angstrom-v2013.12-yocto1.5 branch. :( C

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Koen Kooi : update-rc.d 0.7: don't let update-rc. d start initscripts when systemd is present

On 18.10.2011 14:24, Angstrom Git Repos wrote: > Module: meta-angstrom > Branch: master > Commit: 36a550b314ebb0c30d1c0e565ded197a8682c025 > > Author: Koen Kooi > Date: Tue Oct 18 13:47:58 2011 +0200 > > update-rc.d 0.7: don't let update-rc.d start initscripts when systemd is > present > > T

[Angstrom-devel] runlevel

We like to use different init runlevel in our application for different purposes. Which runlevels are used with which semantics in OE and/or distros using OE (especially Angsrom)? Does OE support runlevels 7-9 like the linux telinit manpage mentions: "Runlevels 7-9 are also valid, though not r

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Problem building oe-core based Ångström on openSUSE 11.4 (64bit)

On 01.07.2011 09:22, Koen Kooi wrote: > > Op 1 jul 2011, om 08:57 heeft Steffen Sledz het volgende geschreven: > >> On 01.07.2011 08:49, Koen Kooi wrote: >>> >>> Op 27 jun 2011, om 17:43 heeft Steffen Sledz het volgende geschreven: >>> >>>&g

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Problem building oe-core based Ångström on openSUSE 11.4 (64bit)

On 01.07.2011 08:49, Koen Kooi wrote: > > Op 27 jun 2011, om 17:43 heeft Steffen Sledz het volgende geschreven: > >> I tried to make an Ångström build using the oebb.sh from the oe-core branch >> following the instructions in [1] (hope they are valid for this branc

[Angstrom-devel] Problem building oe-core based Ångström on openSUSE 11.4 (64bit)

I tried to make an Ångström build using the oebb.sh from the oe-core branch following the instructions in [1] (hope they are valid for this branch too). MACHINE=beagleboard ./oebb.sh config beagleboard MACHINE=beagleboard ./oebb.sh update made no problems, but MACHINE=beagleboard ./oebb.sh

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Strategic Ångström goals

Am 04.03.2011 15:20, schrieb Graeme Gregory: > On 04/03/2011 12:07, Philip Balister wrote: >> On 03/03/2011 06:05 AM, Steffen Sledz wrote: >>> Hi Ångström maintainers, >>> >>> it would be nice, if you can have a look >>> at<http://thread.gmane.o

[Angstrom-devel] Strategic Ångström goals

Hi Ångström maintainers, it would be nice, if you can have a look at and make a statement on the strategic goals for the Ångström distro. This would be really helpful for all the users forced to use older kernels. Th