On 13-06-09 19:37, Dan Poirot wrote:
...Now that you mention it...
Why would the file size of the ZipIt 'bitbake base-image' be twice
the size of the Beagleboard's?
That's probably due to the zipit machine inclusing more packages, which
are dragged in using task-base.
regards,
Koen
On 13-06-09 18:44, Koen Kooi wrote:
Hi,
There was a recent thread on the OE-devel mailinglist about making our
-dbg packages a bit more usefull, so I tried this:
-FULL_OPTIMIZATION = -fexpensive-optimizations -fomit-frame-pointer
-frename-registers -Os
+FULL_OPTIMIZATION =
Ah... I thought that 'base-image' would be 'base-image' in any case...
Are any of these settings using ARM Thumb mode?
On 6/14/09, Koen Kooi k.k...@student.utwente.nl wrote:
On 13-06-09 19:37, Dan Poirot wrote:
...Now that you mention it...
Why would the file size of the ZipIt 'bitbake
On 14-06-09 17:17, Dan Poirot wrote:
Ah... I thought that 'base-image' would be 'base-image' in any case...
task-base is a union between distro and machine, and the zipit machine
could tell task-base to include bogus packages.
Are any of these settings using ARM Thumb mode?
If this is
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Koen Kooi k.k...@student.utwente.nlwrote:
On 14-06-09 17:17, Dan Poirot wrote:
Ah... I thought that 'base-image' would be 'base-image' in any case...
task-base is a union between distro and machine, and the zipit machine
could tell task-base to include
...Now that you mention it...
Why would the file size of the ZipIt 'bitbake base-image' be twice
the size of the Beagleboard's?
On 6/13/09, Koen Kooi k.k...@student.utwente.nl wrote:
Hi,
There was a recent thread on the OE-devel mailinglist about making our
-dbg packages a bit more
