Hello Paul,
Friday, December 14, 2007, 5:52:03 PM, you wrote:
Hello Koen,
Thursday, December 13, 2007, 9:09:07 AM, you wrote:
[]
During last few months, myself and other contributors worked on
bootloading solution which would satisfy the following criteria:
[]
So, based on
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 05:52:03PM +0200, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
So, based on all this, the conclusion can be made that the most
problem-free solution for now would be to use loopback-mounted ext2
images as means to install Angstrom on an arbitrary PocketPC device.
I agree with the
Hello Koen,
Thursday, December 13, 2007, 9:09:07 AM, you wrote:
[]
During last few months, myself and other contributors worked on
bootloading solution which would satisfy the following criteria:
1. Implemented as a Linux-based user-space application, taking
advantage of of the
Hello Rod,
Thursday, December 13, 2007, 4:06:34 AM, you wrote:
Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
During last few months, myself and other contributors worked on
bootloading solution which would satisfy the following criteria:
1. Implemented as a Linux-based user-space application, taking
advantage
On Dec 12, 2007 8:54 PM, Paul Sokolovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, based on the above functionality, I'd like to propose it as a
default bootloading solution for Angstrom, or at least as the default
solution for PocketPC- and Palm-based devices.
Sounds good!
Cliff
--
Hello angstrom-distro-devel,
From the previous experience, one of the pressing issues with
popularizing an embedded Linux distro was a complex and tangled
installation procedure, which not all users can follow. Other problem
is that some distros give up inherent Linux flexibility and force
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Sokolovsky schreef:
Hello angstrom-distro-devel,
From the previous experience, one of the pressing issues with
popularizing an embedded Linux distro was a complex and tangled
installation procedure, which not all users can follow. Other
