On 02/22/2008 03:30 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> It should be
> http://linuxtogo.org/gowiki/Angstrom/Backport_from_dev_to_stable as LTG
> wiki is not for Ångström but for all projects. Thats common mistake done
> by many people.
>
Thanks for fixing that. Btw, I've added Paul's comments abou
Hello,
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:32:44 +0100
Koen Kooi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[]
> | | Speaking of this, I don't see initramfs-bootmenu-image and
> | | liveramdisk-image uclibc images available in autobuild/ ,
> | | corresponding change made to build-release.sh on 2008-02-06.
> Today I | | made
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Koen Kooi schreef:
| Paul Sokolovsky schreef:
| | Hello,
| |
| | On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:23:54 -0500
| | Junqian Gordon Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| |
| | []
| |> what's the frequency of autobuilding -rX machin/image. If I
| |> remember correctl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Sokolovsky schreef:
| Hello,
|
| On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:23:54 -0500
| Junqian Gordon Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
| []
|> what's the frequency of autobuilding -rX machin/image. If I
|> remember correctly, this is every other week.
|
| Spea
Dnia Friday, 22 of February 2008, Junqian Gordon Xu napisał:
> On 02/21/2008 12:13 PM, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> > If I had, I'd probably do that too, even though I think that current
> > process is still an RFC, subject for assessment how performant it is,
> > and open for proposals for improvement
On 02/21/2008 12:13 PM, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> If I had, I'd probably do that too, even though I think that current
> process is still an RFC, subject for assessment how performant it is,
> and open for proposals for improvements. So, IMHO it would be to just
> open a usual wiki page for now.
ht
Hello,
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:23:54 -0500
Junqian Gordon Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[]
> what's the frequency of autobuilding -rX machin/image. If I
> remember correctly, this is every other week.
Speaking of this, I don't see initramfs-bootmenu-image and
liveramdisk-image uclibc images
Hello,
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:23:54 -0500
Junqian Gordon Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As invoked in the other discussion about the landmark for closing
> bug, I think the current process of getting fixes from .dev -->
> stable --> feed leaves a lot to be desired. Here is my 2 cents.
>
> 1. We
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Junqian Gordon Xu schreef:
| As invoked in the other discussion about the landmark for closing bug, I
| think the current process of getting fixes from .dev --> stable --> feed
| leaves a lot to be desired. Here is my 2 cents.
|
| 1. We should make the
As invoked in the other discussion about the landmark for closing bug, I
think the current process of getting fixes from .dev --> stable --> feed
leaves a lot to be desired. Here is my 2 cents.
1. We should make the process as transparent as possible to everybody
(even users, so they will hate
10 matches
Mail list logo
