Re: [Angstrom-devel] Problem with OMAP_MUX kernel module on Beagleboard

2012-01-30 Thread Kövesdi György
> Which u-boot version? I've booted the latest u-boot+ 3.0.17 with rootfs on SD > on a B6, C3, C5, xM A and xM C this weekend without problems. Now, i updated and recompiled everyting. You are right: it works perfectly. Probably i used an older version of u-boot, but it was no more than 1-2 days.

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Problem with OMAP_MUX kernel module on Beagleboard

2012-01-30 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 30 jan. 2012, om 09:09 heeft Gyorgy Kovesdi het volgende geschreven: >> Which u-boot version? I've booted the latest u-boot+ 3.0.17 with rootfs on >> SD on a B6, C3, C5, xM A and xM C this weekend without problems. > > I update it regularly, so it was a corresponding version. Unfortunately i

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Problem with OMAP_MUX kernel module on Beagleboard

2012-01-30 Thread Gyorgy Kovesdi
> Which u-boot version? I've booted the latest u-boot+ 3.0.17 with rootfs on > SD on a B6, C3, C5, xM A and xM C this weekend without problems. I update it regularly, so it was a corresponding version. Unfortunately i am not at my machine now, but will check it tonight. You did not mention C4: is

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Problem with OMAP_MUX kernel module on Beagleboard

2012-01-29 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 29 jan. 2012, om 22:43 heeft Kövesdi György het volgende geschreven: > Hi, > > I reported some days ago a problem with kernel boot: > > [ 4.182769] VFS: Cannot open root device "mmcblk0p2" or unknown-block(179,2) > [ 4.190246] Please append a correct "root=" boot option; here are the > avai

[Angstrom-devel] Problem with OMAP_MUX kernel module on Beagleboard

2012-01-29 Thread Kövesdi György
Hi, I reported some days ago a problem with kernel boot: [ 4.182769] VFS: Cannot open root device "mmcblk0p2" or unknown-block(179,2) [ 4.190246] Please append a correct "root=" boot option; here are the available partitions: [ 4.199127] 1f00 512 mtdblock0 (driver?) [ 4.204437] 1f01 1920 mtdbloc