Hi Maksym,
I did some more investigations. I would say bitbake (branch 1.2) that
is checked out by setup-script (anyway two weeks ago) does not care
about bblayers.conf and layer.conf. You can have anything at all in
these files and you won't see any messages logged regarding these
files. Also
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 8:02 PM, matti kaasinen
matti.kaasi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hii Maksym,
I have to draw my answer back. I tried dirrent combinations of
DISTRIBUTIONs and bitbake and angstrom revisions. Now I could not find
any references from logs regarding to layers - e.g. to bblayers.conf
Hi developers,
I'm using your setup-scripts and providing my own layer. I'm building
my image with bitbake custom-image. Everything works fine, when
building the image from setup-scripts/build directory or using oebb.sh
bitbake custom-image (which just does cd build before building). But
trying
Hi Maksym,
I have experienced the same by using this ~/.oe/environment-2008. It
sets DISTRO = angstrom_2008.1. I assume 2008.1 distro ignoress
bblayers.conf. It seems that angstrom_2010.x grants it. However, if
you have read/used
http://sakrah.homelinux.org/blog/2010/11/bblayers-bbappend/, be
Hii Maksym,
I have to draw my answer back. I tried dirrent combinations of
DISTRIBUTIONs and bitbake and angstrom revisions. Now I could not find
any references from logs regarding to layers - e.g. to bblayers.conf
file (bblayers.conf found or resembling). This was clearly reported
when I had
