[Angstrom-devel] verifying proper bitbaking of ti-cgt6x_6.1.9 for linuxtag

2010-06-02 Thread Robert P. J. Day
since this is the first time i actually built an image with any of the downloadable TI stuff, can i just sanity check what i did? it seems to have worked, but i'd rather have someone else verify i did it correctly. first step in downloading the contents into my dl dir: $ ls -l ti_*

Re: [Angstrom-devel] verifying proper bitbaking of ti-cgt6x_6.1.9 for linuxtag

2010-06-02 Thread Martin Jansa
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 06:08:22AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: since this is the first time i actually built an image with any of the downloadable TI stuff, can i just sanity check what i did? it seems to have worked, but i'd rather have someone else verify i did it correctly.

Re: [Angstrom-devel] verifying proper bitbaking of ti-cgt6x_6.1.9 for linuxtag

2010-06-02 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, Martin Jansa wrote: On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 06:08:22AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: since this is the first time i actually built an image with any of the downloadable TI stuff, can i just sanity check what i did? it seems to have worked, but i'd rather have

Re: [Angstrom-devel] verifying proper bitbaking of ti-cgt6x_6.1.9 for linuxtag

2010-06-02 Thread Martin Jansa
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 06:48:48AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: yup, that's the issue i must have been having. with the original recipe file, i was getting a fetch error, but i overlooked creating the .md5 checksum file. i can throw together a patch to clarify that in the recipe file

Re: [Angstrom-devel] verifying proper bitbaking of ti-cgt6x_6.1.9 for linuxtag

2010-06-02 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, Martin Jansa wrote: On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 06:48:48AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: yup, that's the issue i must have been having. with the original recipe file, i was getting a fetch error, but i overlooked creating the .md5 checksum file. i can throw together a

Re: [Angstrom-devel] verifying proper bitbaking of ti-cgt6x_6.1.9 for linuxtag

2010-06-02 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02-06-10 12:48, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, Martin Jansa wrote: On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 06:08:22AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: since this is the first time i actually built an image with any of the downloadable TI stuff,

Re: [Angstrom-devel] verifying proper bitbaking of ti-cgt6x_6.1.9 for linuxtag

2010-06-02 Thread Robert P. J. Day
regarding my missing creating an md5 checksum file for ti-cgt6x: On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, Koen Kooi wrote: There's a readme in the same dir: http://gitorious.org/angstrom/openembedded/blobs/org.openembedded.dev/recipes/ti/README true, but it says nothing about md5 sums. and, anyway, i'll

Re: [Angstrom-devel] verifying proper bitbaking of ti-cgt6x_6.1.9 for linuxtag

2010-06-02 Thread Martin Jansa
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 07:01:22AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: #$ md5sum ti_cgt_c6000_6.1.9_setup_linux_x86.bin ti_cgt_c6000_6.1.9_setup_linux_x86.bin.md5 does it work when md5sum output contains also file name: $ md5sum Packages d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e Packages $ md5sum

Re: [Angstrom-devel] verifying proper bitbaking of ti-cgt6x_6.1.9 for linuxtag

2010-06-02 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, Martin Jansa wrote: On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 07:01:22AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: #$ md5sum ti_cgt_c6000_6.1.9_setup_linux_x86.bin ti_cgt_c6000_6.1.9_setup_linux_x86.bin.md5 does it work when md5sum output contains also file name: $ md5sum Packages