[Angstrom-devel] ignore this

2007-04-14 Thread Lorn Potter
email test to see if this is working ___ Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel

Re: [Angstrom-devel] [RFC] Official support for OPIE in Angstrom

2007-07-24 Thread Lorn Potter
Paul Sokolovsky wrote: Hello Lorn, Wednesday, July 25, 2007, 12:26:33 AM, you wrote: Paul Sokolovsky wrote: 3. Restructure OPIE installation paths to be more FHS-friendly (with assumption that for OPIE images OPIE is core component, so installing it to /opt is more a historical

Re: [Angstrom-devel] [RFC] Official support for OPIE in Angstrom

2007-07-24 Thread Lorn Potter
Michael Krelin wrote: Michael Krelin wrote: C'mon, guys, what are you arguing over? Not arguing. Discussing. Good to know ;-) As there seems to be an ongoing bias (in Debian, generally) against /opt even existing, I just wanted to point out that FHS does include /opt. I think /opt is

Re: [Angstrom-devel] OE Angstrom reputation

2007-12-27 Thread Lorn Potter
Paul Sokolovsky wrote: As for welcoming feeling, I'm not sure someone can easily point us to similar project to learn from, I'm afraid. other linux embedded build/distribution communities: uClibc, T2, ptxdist, and probably even gumstix. I am sure there are others. All those issues

Re: [Angstrom-devel] OE Angstrom reputation

2007-12-28 Thread Lorn Potter
Paul Sokolovsky wrote: Hello Lorn, Friday, December 28, 2007, 1:43:28 AM, you wrote: Paul Sokolovsky wrote: As for welcoming feeling, I'm not sure someone can easily point us to similar project to learn from, I'm afraid. other linux embedded build/distribution communities:

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Involving People

2007-12-30 Thread Lorn Potter
Ian Bonham wrote: Angstrom is a SUPERB idea. It has huge potential, but at the moment it's a dev's toy. I'm on the verge of removing it, simply because it fails to fulfil a users basic needs. PIM, Music, Video (maybe), the developers needs are second. Yes, a place to play for devs is

Re: [Angstrom-devel] OE Angstrom reputation

2007-12-30 Thread Lorn Potter
Paul Sokolovsky wrote: overruled with superiority-ridden and unparriable responses like it's visually appealing, Well, if you think a terminal is visually appealing, thats fine for you, every commercial foo has it This is the truth. and most Linux developers in the world come from

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Involving People

2007-12-30 Thread Lorn Potter
Matthias Hentges wrote: Interesting idea. While the Angstrom foundation is great, it is (IMO) lacking a good, usable and stable GUI environment. What is wrong with Qtopia? Its open source, it works, and it's in constant development. -- Lorn 'ljp' Potter Software Engineer, Systems Group,

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Lorns overly vague challenge, was: Re: OE Angstrom reputation

2007-12-30 Thread Lorn Potter
On Saturday 29 December 2007, Koen Kooi wrote: Lorn: Firstly: You set a deliberately vague challenge, which requires more information. Secondly: You refuse to give that information and resort to namecalling. please point out where I personally attacked someone and called them a name? I

Re: [Angstrom-devel] VoIP?

2008-01-25 Thread Lorn Potter
Capn_Fish Zaurus wrote: I kind of have a 2-part question here. First off, are there any VoIP clients for Angstrom that I can just BitBake? Qtopia is currently getting added to oe, it has voip included. -- Lorn 'ljp' Potter Software Engineer, Systems Group, MES, Trolltech