Re: [Anima] Result of WGLC on draft-ietf-anima-stable-connectivity-03 - Respond by July 28, 2017

Thanks, Sheng I think i was just posting version -04 when Sheng posted this, it had all the textual fixes from Mohamed. Then i continued with Brian Carpenters feedback that i just posted as version -05, so pls. review version -05. The changelog in the file summarizes all the points. The change

Re: [Anima] ACP document --- 07 to 08 changes

Thanks, Michael for the thorough review. Answers to your mail point by point below. There was a bunch of stuff i did put into acp-09 because of Brians review, and then in finished with your review. Here is just the diffs from your stuff (see below, i need more git help to pull stuff like

Re: [Anima] review comments draft-ietf-anima-stable-connectivity-03-rev Med.doc

On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 12:02:25PM +, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote: > Hi Toerless, > > The new version looks much more better. Thanks. Great. > Some comments about these two minor point: > > - "IPv4 to IPv6 NAT can be used." - Do you mean RFC7915 > I intentionally did not want to

[Anima] I-D Action: draft-ietf-anima-stable-connectivity-05.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach WG of the IETF. Title : Using Autonomic Control Plane for Stable Connectivity of Network OAM Authors

[Anima] I-D Action: draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-09.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach WG of the IETF. Title : An Autonomic Control Plane (ACP) Authors : Michael H. Behringer

Re: [Anima] proxy discovery of registrar

On 03/08/2017 07:46, Michael Richardson wrote: > > Brian E Carpenter wrote: > >> Toerless has instead written the M_FLOOD mechanism. > >> We started a thread a few weeks ago about this... what happened to it, > I > >> would have to look. In either case,

Re: [Anima] proxy discovery of registrar

Brian E Carpenter wrote: >> Toerless has instead written the M_FLOOD mechanism. >> We started a thread a few weeks ago about this... what happened to it, I >> would have to look. In either case, I would like to please discuss this >> in the context

Re: [Anima] [6tisch] Cross-WGs WGLC (second) on draft-ietf-anima-voucher-04 - Respond by Aug 08, 2017

peter van der Stok wrote: > section 6, leaf prior-signed-voucher, at the end: > The MASA SHOULD remove all "prior-signed-voucher". > I would encourage a "MUST" instead of a "SHOULD" when thinking of > transporting vouchers over constrained networks. I believe

[Anima] ANIMA ACP -08 -- estimating depth of DODAG in storing mode

Brian E Carpenter wrote: > [One detail however: >> The loop-count MUST be sete to 255. When an ACP node >> receives the M_FLOOD, it will have been reduced by the number of hops >> from the EST server. > I don't like that. The role of the loop