Hi Michael,
I did not want to reopen the bottle on GRASP, and i did not want to
delay ACP spec either with discussions about this naming strategy either.
Therefore my idea was to simply use SRV.est in ACP without having to decide
whether
or not this should or should not become a generic scheme.
Hi, WG.
I'm the designated expert reviewer for GRASP Object Names.
IANA asked me to look at autonomic-control-plane. What fun!
I had NO problems with AN_ACP or SRV.est, but the following paragraph surprised
me:
>Note that the objective format "SRV." is intended to be
>used for any
Inline
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 10:15:07AM +0530, Anoop Kumar Pandey wrote:
> >the assumption in ANIMA is that the world is actually not-trusted and
> instead has a lot of bad things happening and the cryptographic procedures
> of BRSKI/ACP serve to create a "trusted domain/network" in the >face
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 10:00:10PM -0500, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> Yes, that in the thread, where I referred to a thread back in January 2017,
> in which you were involved in coming up with the names.
>
> >> + , and may be
> >> + enabled only if the JRC indicates support for
