Toerless Eckert wrote:
> Nonwithstanding the more detailled explanations you provided for Anoop,
> what i wuild think to be helpful to write into the security ection is
like this:
> Domain trusting pledge/manufacturer:
I tried to use your text directly, but after
'Toerless Eckert' wrote:
>> Now when a pledge wants to validate the JRC, he simply needs to verify
>> the signature of MI on the invoice. No communication with MASA or even
>> MASA itself is not required.
> Yes. I have this picture in my head of a guy (called
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 11:45:06AM -0500, Michael Richardson wrote:
> Toerless Eckert wrote:
> > So, lets see if i understand your guidance:
>
> > I will remove the explanatory paragraph, but wait for the next rev i
> need to do
> > for IANA/IESG review anyhow. I
Toerless Eckert wrote:
> So, lets see if i understand your guidance:
> I will remove the explanatory paragraph, but wait for the next rev i need
to do
> for IANA/IESG review anyhow. I will keep the suggested name SRV.est.
check!
--
] Never tell me the
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 12:37:47PM +0530, Anoop Kumar Pandey wrote:
> I think that is not necessary. When a pledge/device is bought, it is manually
> added to a network of buyer [usually intranet], where it can discover a JRC.
> Therefore it is not the choice/privilege of pledge to verify the
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and
Approach WG of the IETF.
Title : A Reference Model for Autonomic Networking
Authors : Michael H. Behringer
On 18/01/18 09:59, Sheng Jiang wrote:
Hi, authors of anima-reference-model,
I have reviewed the draft as the document shepherd, see below
comments. Overall, I feel this document is very useful and it is
almost ready for be published. Please properly address my comments
together with other