Re: [Anima] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-anima-reference-model-08: (with COMMENT)

""This section discusses a topic for further research” sounds good to me. Thanks! Ben. > On Oct 25, 2018, at 2:47 PM, Michael H. Behringer > wrote: > > Ah, now I understand. Thanks for clarifying. Yes, we really used it as sort > of a "boiler plate" for topics that are not part of this

Re: [Anima] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-anima-reference-model-08: (with COMMENT)

On 25/10/2018 14:01, Alissa Cooper wrote: -- COMMENT: -- Since draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra is a normative reference in this document, IDevID seems

Re: [Anima] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-anima-reference-model-08: (with COMMENT)

On 25/10/2018 05:21, Spencer Dawkins at IETF wrote: Hi, Brian, On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 10:16 PM Brian E Carpenter wrote: Hi

Re: [Anima] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-anima-reference-model-08: (with COMMENT)

Ah, now I understand. Thanks for clarifying. Yes, we really used it as sort of a "boiler plate" for topics that are not part of this phase of ANIMA work. I guess we just introduced (informational)^2. I'm happy to change that "boiler plate" text.  What about "This section discusses a topic for

Re: [Anima] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-anima-reference-model-08: (with COMMENT)

Hi Michael, My real concern is that “informational” is a term of art in the IETF, and the use of it to label “later phase” sections is a different use than that. I will leave it to the authors to decide if that would be confusing to the target audience. Thanks! Ben. > On Oct 25, 2018, at

[Anima] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-anima-reference-model-08: (with COMMENT)

Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-anima-reference-model-08: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please

Re: [Anima] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-anima-reference-model-08: (with COMMENT)

Hi Ben, thanks for your review! Yes, we're a bit "verbose" with those topics. There was a consistent worry all through our work to distinguish phase 1 and phase 2 work, and to not let phase 2 work creep into phase 1. So we probably erred on the more "explicit" wording, trying to make REALLY