Re: [Anima] BRSKI support for asynchronous processing

2018-11-27 Thread Brian E Carpenter
On 2018-11-28 02:11, Eliot Lear wrote: > Hi Steffen > >> On 27 Nov 2018, at 11:49, Fries, Steffen wrote: >> >> Getting back to my original question, do you see the asynchronous handling >> of pledge enrolment as part of the current charter of the working group? > > I don’t know (I'll leave the

Re: [Anima] BRSKI support for asynchronous processing

2018-11-27 Thread Brian E Carpenter
On 2018-11-28 00:49, Fries, Steffen wrote: > Hi Eliot ... >>> OK, thanks. I'm interested in another scenario too: one where the operator >>> will not accept using a connection to the open Internet and therefore will >>> not accept any real-time access to any MASA. As I've said for several >>>

Re: [Anima] BRSKI support for asynchronous processing

2018-11-27 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Hi Eliot, On 2018-11-27 23:04, Eliot Lear wrote: > > >> OK, thanks. I'm interested in another scenario too: one where the operator >> will not accept using a connection to the open Internet and therefore will >> not accept any real-time access to any MASA. As I've said for several years, >>

Re: [Anima] BRSKI support for asynchronous processing

2018-11-27 Thread Fries, Steffen
Hi Eliot On 27 Nov 2018, at 11:49, Fries, Steffen mailto:steffen.fr...@siemens.com>> wrote: Getting back to my original question, do you see the asynchronous handling of pledge enrolment as part of the current charter of the working group? I don’t know (I'll leave the to the chairs). Assuming

Re: [Anima] BRSKI support for asynchronous processing

2018-11-27 Thread Eliot Lear
Hi Steffen > On 27 Nov 2018, at 11:49, Fries, Steffen wrote: > > Getting back to my original question, do you see the asynchronous handling of > pledge enrolment as part of the current charter of the working group? I don’t know (I'll leave the to the chairs). Assuming yes: > If yes, would

Re: [Anima] BRSKI support for asynchronous processing

2018-11-27 Thread Fries, Steffen
Hi Eliot OK, thanks. I'm interested in another scenario too: one where the operator will not accept using a connection to the open Internet and therefore will not accept any real-time access to any MASA. As I've said for several years, this is a highly likely scenario in some types of network

Re: [Anima] BRSKI support for asynchronous processing

2018-11-27 Thread Eliot Lear
> OK, thanks. I'm interested in another scenario too: one where the operator > will not accept using a connection to the open Internet and therefore will > not accept any real-time access to any MASA. As I've said for several years, > this is a highly likely scenario in some types of network