Henk Birkholz wrote:
> If there is interest in this application of a source for freshness, we
> can certainly make that happen.
> And while we are at it: If ANIMA has any requirements on potential
> payloads of an epoch marker, please say so :-)
So while I know exactly what I
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> We would prefer that this doesn't invalidate existing (unsigned) GRASP
> code. That could be done by appending an optional signature to the
> existing M_FLOOD message format. An alternative is to add a new flood
> format that is signed, but would not be
Hi Michael,
similar to a MUD URL, an Epoch ID (or epoch marker, see:
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-birkholz-rats-epoch-markers-01.html) can
be conveyed via many vehicles. As MUD URLs can, for example, be included
in LLDP payload, it seems like a low hanging fruit to me to distribute
Epoch
