On 2022-10-27, at 19:57, Toerless Eckert wrote:
>
> next hop
??
I thought we were in a thread about Uri-Path.
(If this is indeed a reverse proxy, that gets to choose the paths it supports;
I don’t know what paths the actual registrar would use — sorry for not
following all the discussion
Can we make sure that the text does explain why the field is not
inclueded, and explain that the packet MUST be rejected if it was included ?
Seems like:
Field is not included and would cause rejection of the packet if it was
present, because it is inappropriate for the initiator to choose the
Swapped agenda slots to do that.
Cheers
Toerless
On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 06:29:34AM +, Fries, Steffen wrote:
> Hi Toerless,
>
> It would be good to have JWS-Voucher and BRSKI-PRM next to each other as
> BRSKI-PRM utilizes JWS-Voucher.
>
> Thank you,
> Steffen
>
Hi Toerless,
It would be good to have JWS-Voucher and BRSKI-PRM next to each other as
BRSKI-PRM utilizes JWS-Voucher.
Thank you,
Steffen
From: Anima on behalf of Toerless Eckert
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2022 4:26:30 AM
To: anima@ietf.org
Cc:
