Re: [Anima] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy-12, ends September 20th 2022

2022-11-03 Thread Michael Richardson
Toerless Eckert wrote: >> Your 868 system might be unable to complete onboarding, or maybe it will take >> an hour. > I have to admit i do not even managed to figure out the nominal bitrate best case > for he 969 Mhz system ;-) But also the ZWave "Interview" (the system i am

Re: [Anima] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy-12, ends September 20th 2022

2022-11-03 Thread Toerless Eckert
On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 10:33:47AM +, Michael Richardson wrote: > > How would you deal with proxies that are on frequencies where the duty > cycle > > is limited by law. For example devices on my 868 home automation > network needs to maintain > > a 1%/hour duty cycle. > > "by

Re: [Anima] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy-12, ends September 20th 2022

2022-11-03 Thread Michael Richardson
Toerless Eckert wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 07:49:06AM +, Esko Dijk wrote: >> For the stateless proxy, it is hard to determine a good rate limit number. 1% is not good because it would slow down the joining process of a genuine Pledge to a crawl. Some strategies that could

Re: [Anima] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy-12, ends September 20th 2022

2022-11-03 Thread Toerless Eckert
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 07:49:06AM +, Esko Dijk wrote: > For the stateless proxy, it is hard to determine a good rate limit number. 1% > is not good because it would slow down the joining process of a genuine > Pledge to a crawl. Some strategies that could work better: What is the typical