Carsten Bormann wrote:
> On 2022-11-24, at 17:02, Jan Lindblad (jlindbla)
> wrote:
>>
>> If any of this causes problems with SID generation, I'm afraid that's
>> not my territory. :-)
> I think it would be good if there were sx:structure support in PYANG
> that we
On 2022-11-24, at 17:02, Jan Lindblad (jlindbla)
wrote:
>
> If any of this causes problems with SID generation, I'm afraid that's not my
> territory. :-)
I think it would be good if there were sx:structure support in PYANG that we
can use.
(Which still may not be your territory…)
Grüße,
Jan Lindblad (jlindbla) wrote:
>> I have taken a third pass at getting the extension of yang modules
>> done.
> Sorry for my slow response. I had a look at your latest version now,
> and I think it looks good from a general YANG pov.
so, this business of each module defining
wrote:
> You should run it with "--tree-print-structures".
Thanks. That makes sense.
I admit that much of my pyang use is cargo culted from one draft to another.
--
Michael Richardson. o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
Michael,
> I have taken a third pass at getting the extension of yang modules done.
Sorry for my slow response. I had a look at your latest version now, and I
think it looks good from a general YANG pov.
> This time, I am using RFC8791 (Structure), rather than YANG-DATA.
> I do not use
