Here is my feedback / review of -06:
Thanks a lot for this work. Looks good. Now if we could just split up all the
hard work into simple small docs like this ;-))
Couple of hopefully easy to fix text nits. two simple process 'majors',
only maybe somewhat a point of discussion is to upgrade all
>1) The use cases motivate doing the work.
>2) The use cases tell us something about the threat/risk/benefit of the
> environment, and inform the reviewer what assumptions have been made.
Hi, Michael,
This sounds reasonable. I truly think the technical requirements here are
valid. It is the
Sheng Jiang wrote:
> I actually agree your observation on the supportiveness of use case
> section. We were discussing to move use cases section into
> appendix. Overall, use cases here are not necessary or as a MUST. What
> we should focus on is the validity of technical
Hi, Michael,
I actually agree your observation on the supportiveness of use case section. We
were discussing to move use cases section into appendix. Overall, use cases
here are not necessary or as a MUST. What we should focus on is the validity of
technical requirements on Section 4. If yes,
