On 9/9/22 01:33, Toerless Eckert wrote:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 12:44:05PM +0200, Hendrik Mahrt wrote:
On the other hand, a more typical ISP situation is there is a router with
three or four WAN links, each of which is a p2p ethernet. In that case,
there is really only one peer on each link,
On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 12:44:05PM +0200, Hendrik Mahrt wrote:
> > On the other hand, a more typical ISP situation is there is a router with
> > three or four WAN links, each of which is a p2p ethernet. In that case,
> > there is really only one peer on each link, and it makes no sense not to
>
On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 05:12:44AM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
> My thinking, which may be entirely wrong, is that the idea is to keep at most
> three IPsec tunnels up with potential parents.
I think ACP does not describe anything like this (which is fine, because
optimizations only need to
