On 2023-02-26, at 00:02, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> Thank you... but the YANG still went through your brain, not a tool :-)
> So, I'm still concerned that the content might be wrong in some way that
> deceives our brains.
Yep, somebody SHOULD write that tool.
(Hmm, need to find a BYGS
Carsten Bormann wrote:
> On 2023-02-25, at 23:21, Carsten Bormann wrote:
>>
>> Examples don’t validate.
> Patchup script included.
> (But errata not yet submitted.)
>
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-bormann-cbor-rfc-cddl-models-01.html#name-rfc-8366
Thank
On 2023-02-25, at 23:21, Carsten Bormann wrote:
>
> Examples don’t validate.
Patchup script included.
(But errata not yet submitted.)
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-bormann-cbor-rfc-cddl-models-01.html#name-rfc-8366
Grüße, Carsten
___
Anima
