Re: [Anima] ACP vs. Data plane Re: Signing GRASP objectives [Was: Extending GRASP messages and signing GRASP multicasts]

2022-08-26 Thread Toerless Eckert
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 12:05:54PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote: > > Light switches could M_FLOOD instructions, such as in old building > > automation: GROUP_123 on/off. And lights are then preconfigured to > > belong to a group. Or as you propose, they could M_FLOOD status, as you

Re: [Anima] ACP vs. Data plane Re: Signing GRASP objectives [Was: Extending GRASP messages and signing GRASP multicasts]

2022-08-25 Thread Michael Richardson
Toerless Eckert wrote: > I can not link ICN to the use-cases you describe. I could however > easily map the resilient light-switch use-case to multicast and GRASP: okay. > Light switches could M_FLOOD instructions, such as in old building > automation: GROUP_123 on/off. And

[Anima] ACP vs. Data plane Re: Signing GRASP objectives [Was: Extending GRASP messages and signing GRASP multicasts]

2022-08-25 Thread Toerless Eckert
Changing subject because i think this is a broader/different discussion than GRASP signature/extensions I can not link ICN to the use-cases you describe. I could however easily map the resilient light-switch use-case to multicast and GRASP: Light switches could M_FLOOD instructions, such as in