Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-19: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2020-02-10 Thread Toerless Eckert
Email last week may have been off-list, so let me repeat for the WG: Working on -23 to address your review, Eric. At a conference mon-wed, so a bit slower finishing it. There are still outstanding points from Ben, he is on PTO this week, but hopefully we can finish those next week. Cheers Toe

Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-19: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2020-02-06 Thread Michael Richardson
Toerless Eckert wrote: > Thanks a lot for the review, just committed -22 to answer to your > review, providing separate diffs inline for the rfc822 vs IPsec parts > to easier separate out the fixes for you. For everybody else, they can > just do a diff -21 -> -22, which will also

Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-19: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2020-02-03 Thread Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
Toerless Thank you for this updated revision. About the next steps: On 04/02/2020, 05:49, "iesg on behalf of Toerless Eckert" wrote: Hi Benjamin -%<--%<- > That said, my one Discuss point is not the end of the road for things; > since as I understand it the

Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-19: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2020-02-03 Thread Toerless Eckert
Hi Benjamin Thanks a lot for the review, just committed -22 to answer to your review, providing separate diffs inline for the rfc822 vs IPsec parts to easier separate out the fixes for you. For everybody else, they can just do a diff -21 -> -22, which will also include the input changes to your re

Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-19: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2019-12-30 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
Hi Toerless, [Note for everyone else: I've been looking at an editor's copy with some updates since the -21; diff from the -21 is available at ttp://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/rfcdiff.pyht?url1=https://tools.ietf.org/id/draf t-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-21.txt&url2=https://raw.githubuser

Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-19: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2019-11-03 Thread Toerless Eckert
Hi Ben, In my last reply to your review from Jul 24th (appended below), i resolved most issues in -20, and mentioned two open issues. I hope i "resolved" them with -21 which i just posted. Diff 20 - 21: http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/rfcdiff.pyht?url1=https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ani

Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-19: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2019-07-22 Thread Toerless Eckert
--- Context: I hope i am correctly restating, that this reply is as follows: -> After finishing second round of replies for -16, Ben Kaduk provided a reply that is now also his new DISCUS position on datsatracker. this is my reply to that DISCUS. -> The diff for the changes discussed in th

[Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-19: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2019-07-16 Thread Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-19: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please