Hi, all,
We received no negative response to the WGLC on draft-ietf-anima-brski-ae-04
during the two-week WGLC and we did receive good reviews through the WG
document stage (started from July 2020, as draft-ietf-anima-brski-async-enroll)
and WGLC period. Considering the past history of this wor
Thanks Brian
MichaelR just made the excellent suggestion during the BRSKI call to change the
reference to the URL of the presentation that included te slide from IETF
proceeding - which i think are considered to be ver stable.
I'll finish the shepherd review template and include this point in any
I have insufficient security expertise to review the details of this draft, but
it seems to be complete and well written.
Section 4.2 "Message Exchange" refers to a diagram stored on GitHub in PNG
format. It's a nice diagram, but I think that it's a bad idea to embed a GitHub URL in an
RFC. Th
Dear ANIMAers,
This message starts the two-week (*) ANIMA Working Group Last Call to advance
draft-ietf-anima-brski-ae-04, which defines an enhancement of Bootstrapping
Remote Secure Key Infrastructure (BRSKI, RFC 8995) that supports alternative
certificate enrollment protocols.
This document'
