Christian Amsüss wrote:
>> It's not unidirectional! I'm not able to parse "semi-" here, but I
>> suspect that is what you are trying to get at.
> What I meant was "duplex, but one side can only reply to traffic
> initiated by the other"; I think we're in agreement here.
There
Hello Michael,
> It's not unidirectional!
> I'm not able to parse "semi-" here, but I suspect that is what you are trying
> to get at.
What I meant was "duplex, but one side can only reply to traffic
initiated by the other"; I think we're in agreement here.
> > Given that this only works
Hi, I've added anima@ietf.org, and removed some of the direct CC's, because I
know those people are on the MLs. I will also reply a few times with the
intention of splitting up the discussion into better threads.
Christian Amsüss wrote:
> There are some aspects about both rt= that make me
