Esko Dijk wrote:
> 1. Given the existing names of registrations in the Structured Syntax
> Suffixes registry, the following name would be more appropriate
> perhaps:
> Name: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE)
> 2. While STD96 as reference is probably correct, it
: Anima On Behalf Of Michael Richardson
Sent: Friday, April 7, 2023 18:47
To: media-ty...@ietf.org
Cc: anima@ietf.org; c...@ietf.org
Subject: [Anima] registration for +cose
as per RFC6838:
Name: application/cose
+suffix: +cose
References: STD96
Encoding considerations: CBOR is always encoded
as per RFC6838:
Name: application/cose
+suffix: +cose
References: STD96
Encoding considerations: CBOR is always encoded as binary
Interoperability considerations: None
Fragment identifier considerations: N/A
Security considerations: as per STD96
Contact: IETF COSE WG
Author/Change controller:
