Re: [Anima] mcr's YANG question raised during the ANIMA WG session

2022-08-03 Thread Michael Richardson
I ran the test. It is at: https://github.com/anima-wg/voucher/tree/voucher-D-test in the sub-directory "augment", with the script, "test1.sh" I wrote ietf-voucher-D.yang, importing both ietf-voucher-request-constrai...@2021-04-15.yang and ietf-voucher-request-...@2022-07-05.yang which both

Re: [Anima] mcr's YANG question raised during the ANIMA WG session

2022-08-02 Thread Fries, Steffen
Hi Toerless > -Original Message- > From: Toerless Eckert > Sent: Dienstag, 2. August 2022 02:09 > Let me rephrase to make clear i understand. > > We've got (A) BRSKI, and (B) and (C) two "independent" amendmentds > driven as independent RFCs. And neither (B) has (C) as reference, nor

Re: [Anima] mcr's YANG question raised during the ANIMA WG session

2022-08-01 Thread Toerless Eckert
Let me rephrase to make clear i understand. We've got (A) BRSKI, and (B) and (C) two "independent" amendmentds driven as independent RFCs. And neither (B) has (C) as reference, nor vice versa, but both refer only to (A). When a user wants to build product incorporating (A), (B), (C), i am sure

Re: [Anima] mcr's YANG question raised during the ANIMA WG session

2022-07-29 Thread Michael Richardson
Fries, Steffen wrote: > Thank you for the clarification. This means we don't have to change > anything in either BRSKI-PRM and constraint voucher, resp. in the > general approach we use the voucher. Yes! I was worred that there were dragons in the future, but seems not. -- Michael

Re: [Anima] mcr's YANG question raised during the ANIMA WG session

2022-07-29 Thread Fries, Steffen
> Sent: Donnerstag, 28. Juli 2022 20:46 > To: Anima@ietf.org > Cc: net...@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Anima] mcr's YANG question raised during the ANIMA WG > session > > > A-> B > \ . > \ . >\ . > V

Re: [Anima] mcr's YANG question raised during the ANIMA WG session

2022-07-28 Thread Michael Richardson
A-> B \ . \ . \ . V V C . . . . > D I had lunch with Rob today and explained the situation. There are two answers! If D is a new YANG module (/RFC) that wants to augment B and augment C then it just works,

Re: [Anima] mcr's YANG question raised during the ANIMA WG session

2022-07-27 Thread Fries, Steffen
Hi Michael, > -Original Message- > From: Michael Richardson > Sent: Mittwoch, 27. Juli 2022 16:50 > To: Fries, Steffen (T CST) ; Anima@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Anima] mcr's YANG question raised during the ANIMA WG > session > > > Fries, Steffen wrote:

Re: [Anima] mcr's YANG question raised during the ANIMA WG session

2022-07-27 Thread Michael Richardson
Fries, Steffen wrote: > I've got a question to the YANG question you raised in the ANIMA WG > meeting yesterday. You said you would like to have some expert review > on the usage of YANG in the BRSKI related documents regarding data at > rest. Are you targeting the usage of YANG