Re: [Anima] Mirja Kuehlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-anima-stable-connectivity-07: (with DISCUSS)

Hi Toerless, thanks a lot for the updated text. I still have one little point I would like to discuss a bit further on this text: "The above described behavior/policy for MPTCP must be controllable by applications or libraries acting on behalf of applications. APIs and/or data models

Re: [Anima] Mirja Kuehlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-anima-stable-connectivity-07: (with DISCUSS)

Thanks, Mirja. Inline. On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 01:37:58PM +0100, Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) wrote: > Hi Toerless, > > thanks a lot for the updated text. I still have one little point I would like > to discuss a bit further on this text: > > "The above described behavior/policy for MPTCP must be

Re: [Anima] [Tsv-art] TSV-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-anima-stable-connectivity

Hi Toerless, Thanks for the updates. It looks better to me. Just one very minor comment.. "GACP and data-plane addresses exist in different VRFs. The MPTCP stack needs to be able to access multiple VRFs and know which local address is existing in which VRF. There also needs to be a