Re: [Anima] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-limited-domains-03.txt

2018-09-12 Thread Brian E Carpenter
On 2018-09-13 00:40, Michael Richardson wrote:
> 
> Brian E Carpenter  wrote:
> > Discussion welcome, perhaps on int-a...@ietf.org.
> 
> okay, I'll go read the document if it's relevant... but you CC'ed here is
> the ACP a limited domain?
> Or does ANIMA make it more practical in some way to support limited domains?

I think the ACP would qualify (since it sets a trust boundary and GRASP
should not be able to leave the AN domain). But also BRSKI+ACP solves
the problem of identifying domain members and delimiting the domain.

So Yes to both your questions.

Brian

___
Anima mailing list
Anima@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima


Re: [Anima] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-limited-domains-03.txt

2018-09-12 Thread Michael Richardson

Brian E Carpenter  wrote:
> Discussion welcome, perhaps on int-a...@ietf.org.

okay, I'll go read the document if it's relevant... but you CC'ed here is
the ACP a limited domain?
Or does ANIMA make it more practical in some way to support limited domains?


--
Michael Richardson , Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-





signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Anima mailing list
Anima@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima