Hendrik Mahrt wrote:
> I'm not quite sure how the type of media or its capability to broadcast
> interacts with RPL parent selection. The way I understand ACP, IPsec
> tunnels are established with all link neighbors of the same ACP domain.
Yes. In a busy L2 broadcast domain,
Hello Michael,
> It's not unidirectional!
> I'm not able to parse "semi-" here, but I suspect that is what you are trying
> to get at.
What I meant was "duplex, but one side can only reply to traffic
initiated by the other"; I think we're in agreement here.
> > Given that this only works
Christian Amsüss wrote:
> * Similarly, the query for ?rt=brski.jp returns a resource, when it is
> actually asking for a transport endpoint. Moreover, there *are*
> resources available that the pledge likely will need to discover (any
> of the brski.rv/vs/es). Before I can make
Hi, I've added anima@ietf.org, and removed some of the direct CC's, because I
know those people are on the MLs. I will also reply a few times with the
intention of splitting up the discussion into better threads.
Christian Amsüss wrote:
> There are some aspects about both rt= that make me
