So, this proposes to use CBOR to "compress" JSON, preserving JWT/JOSE signatures, rather than using CWT. I'm not sure what I think of this as yet.
--- Begin Message ---[Cross-posted to ACE, CBOR, JOSE, JSON because it might be of interest to folks on all four lists.] Folks here might have an interest in an I-D that Jeremie Miller and I just submitted, defining a set of mapping rules from JSON to CBOR that preserves all semantic information. The intent is to use the JOSE standards (and related work such as OpenID Connect) unmodified in constrained environments. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-miller-json-constrained-notation-00 For now, please send feedback directly to the authors. Thanks! Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://filament.com/ _______________________________________________ CBOR mailing list c...@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor
--- End Message ---
-- Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list Anima@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
