Thanks for your reply. Responses to questions below.
On 7/12/19 4:07 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
---
> §5.6
>> {
>> "ietf-voucher:voucher": {
>> "nonce": "62a2e7693d82fcda2624de58fb6722e5",
Max and Toerless, please search for your name.
Adam Roach via Datatracker wrote:
> §2.1
>> |+--v---+
>> || (5) Enroll |<---+ (non-error HTTP codes )
>> ^+ |\___/ (e.g. 201 'Retry-After')
>> | Enroll +--+
FYI what you all are discussing are potential changes to the normative language
of
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-22#section-7.2
Probably strengthening this paragraph from MAY/SHOULD to a MUST:
3. The pledge MAY have an operational mode where it skips vo
Hi Adam
> On 12 Jul 2019, at 00:25, Adam Roach wrote:
>
>
> The smallest change that would satisfy my concern would be a statement that
> says that devices conformant to this specification MUST contain a local means
> of bootstrapping that does not rely on any specific server being available.
