https://tinyurl.com/yylruorn contains an updated diff against -24.
Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker wrote:
> Section 5.2
> application/voucher-cms+json The request is a "YANG-defined JSON
> document that has been signed using a CMS structure" as described
> in Section 3 using
> I think so; there are some details of resale that BRSKI would like to make
> out-of-scope for the first document. Some way, we have to deal with it, and
> I would actually like feedback from OPC about the parameters of different
> solutions here.
There are two things I would like to
