Re: [Anima] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-24

2020-04-09 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Hi Joel, What a great review. I have comments on both your major comments, and an important comment near the bottom of your minor comments. On 10-Apr-20 14:16, Joel Halpern via Datatracker wrote: > Reviewer: Joel Halpern > Review result: Not Ready > Summary: > I have two major concern

[Anima] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-24

2020-04-09 Thread Joel Halpern via Datatracker
Reviewer: Joel Halpern Review result: Not Ready Hello, I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The

[Anima] ACME integrations with BRSKI and cmcRA bit

2020-04-09 Thread Michael Richardson
Esko Dijk wrote: > Currently BRSKI Section 5.5.4 has this text: doc> The MASA MUST verify that the registrar voucher-request is signed by a registrar > If the Registrar would use a non-RA certificate e.g. ACME (LE) standard > EE certificate, then it seems that it cannot get

Re: [Anima] I-D Action: draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-40.txt

2020-04-09 Thread Michael Richardson
Esko Dijk wrote: > The new text looks good now. I was still wondering about the pg 12 > requirement in RFC 8366 ; which amounts to: > The [domain certificate supplied to the pledge separately by the > bootstrapping protocol] MUST have [pinned-domain-cert] somewhere in its >

[Anima] Protocol Action: 'Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructures (BRSKI)' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-41.txt)

2020-04-09 Thread The IESG
The IESG has approved the following document: - 'Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructures (BRSKI)' (draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-41.txt) as Proposed Standard This document is the product of the Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach Working Group. The IESG contact

Re: [Anima] Updated agenda ANIMA virtual interim

2020-04-09 Thread Toerless Eckert
Thanks, always helps to steal from OPS folks ;-)) On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 10:40:27AM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote: > Toerless, thank you for a beautifully complete agenda document. > > (I have seen some doozies this week...) > > -- > ] Never tell me the odds! |

Re: [Anima] 1 missing deck left.. Re: Updated agenda ANIMA virtual interim

2020-04-09 Thread Toerless Eckert
Don't see slides pending in datatracker for: Operational Considerations for BRSKI Registrar draft-richardson-anima-registrar-considerations-03 Jie Yang 10 minutes On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 10:39:04AM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote: > Toerless Eckert wrote: > > Operational Considerations for

Re: [Anima] Updated agenda ANIMA virtual interim

2020-04-09 Thread Michael Richardson
Toerless, thank you for a beautifully complete agenda document. (I have seen some doozies this week...) -- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works|IoT architect [ ] m...@sandelman.ca

Re: [Anima] 1 missing deck left.. Re: Updated agenda ANIMA virtual interim

2020-04-09 Thread Michael Richardson
Toerless Eckert wrote: > Operational Considerations for BRSKI Registrar > draft-richardson-anima-registrar-considerations-03 You should have had it uploaded 20 minutes ago. ___ Anima mailing list Anima@ietf.org

[Anima] 1 missing deck left.. Re: Updated agenda ANIMA virtual interim

2020-04-09 Thread Toerless Eckert
Still missing slides for: Operational Considerations for BRSKI Registrar draft-richardson-anima-registrar-considerations-03 (i think) All other decks uploaded. ___ Anima mailing list Anima@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima