On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 09:47:59PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> Ben, is this DISCUSS comment still alive?
>From memory, I think it's been resolved.
I'm sure that a discuss about whether/how the RPL root is automatically
determined got resolved for *some* document, but am not 100% sure
Ben, is this DISCUSS comment still alive?
> Section 6.11.1.14 places a normative ("SHOULD") requirement on the RPL
> root, but if I understand correctly the RPL root is automatically
> determined within the ACP, and thus the operator does not a priori know
> which node will become the RPL root.
Thank you very much, Amanda!
On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 07:28:47PM +, Amanda Baber via RT wrote:
> Hi Toerless, all,
>
> We've added the following early allocation to the SMI Security for PKIX
> Module Identifier (1.3.6.1.5.5.7.0) registry:
>
> 97id-mod-anima-acpnodename-2020 (TEMPORARY -
Hi Toerless, all,
We've added the following early allocation to the SMI Security for PKIX Module
Identifier (1.3.6.1.5.5.7.0) registry:
97 id-mod-anima-acpnodename-2020 (TEMPORARY - registered 2020-07-07,
expires 2021-07-07) [draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-27]
We've also
Dear IANA
In followup to subject early allocation request:
RFC7120 justifications:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/X3h4AUHg2sMdyatpkZAliOhJEMs
AD Approval for early allocation:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/lpkxTrFWOnvo_khhQ-G7wx8oEzs/
Registry expert feedback
On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 5:29 AM Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote:
>
> I approve this request for IANA early allocation.
>
> Warren, am I right to assume that the next step is for Sheng or Toerless (as
> WG chairs) to make a request via
> https://www.iana.org/form/protocol-assignment?
Yup, that should
I approve this request for IANA early allocation.
Warren, am I right to assume that the next step is for Sheng or Toerless (as WG
chairs) to make a request via https://www.iana.org/form/protocol-assignment?
Regards,
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: Sheng Jiang
> Sent: 07 July 2020
