Re: [Anima] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8995 (7576)

2023-11-08 Thread Michael Richardson

Rebecca VanRheenen  wrote:
> We are unable to verify this erratum that the submitter marked as
> editorial.  Please note that we have changed the “Type” of the
> following errata report to “Technical”.  As Stream Approver, please
> review and set the Status and Type accordingly (see the definitions at
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata-definitions/).

I filed this report after some discussion on the list.
It fixes a comment, rather than the underlying CDDL.

So I agree that it's not strictly editorial.

> You may review the report at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7576

> Please see https://www.rfc-editor.org/how-to-verify/ for further
> information on how to verify errata reports.

> Further information on errata can be found at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php.

> Thank you.

> RFC Editor/rv


>> On Jul 26, 2023, at 9:33 AM, RFC Errata System
>>  wrote:
>>
>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8995,
>> "Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructure (BRSKI)".
>>
>> --
>> You may review the report below and at:
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7576
>>
>> --
>> Type: Editorial Reported by: Michael Richardson
>> 
>>
>> Section: 4.3
>>
>> Original Text
>> -
>> objective-value = text ; name of the (list of) supported ; protocols:
>> "EST-TLS" for RFC 7030.
>>
>>
>> Corrected Text
>> --
>> objective-value = text ; name of the supported protocols.  ; e.g.,
>> "EST-TLS" for RFC 7030.
>>
>>
>> Notes
>> -
>> This objective does not support a list of supported protocols.  The
>> comment in the example might lead people to conclude they can do that.
>>
>> Instructions:
>> -
>> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in
>> to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>>
>> --
>> RFC8995 (draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-45)
>> --
>> Title : Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructure (BRSKI)
>> Publication Date : May 2021 Author(s) : M. Pritikin, M. Richardson,
>> T. Eckert, M. Behringer, K. Watsen Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source
>> : Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach Area : Operations
>> and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
>>


--
Michael Richardson , Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-  *I*LIKE*TRAINS*





signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Anima mailing list
Anima@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima


Re: [Anima] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8995 (7576)

2023-11-08 Thread Rebecca VanRheenen
Hi Robert,

We are unable to verify this erratum that the submitter marked as editorial.  
Please note that we have changed the “Type” of the following errata 
report to “Technical”.  As Stream Approver, please review and set the 
Status and Type accordingly (see the definitions at 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata-definitions/).

You may review the report at: 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7576

Please see https://www.rfc-editor.org/how-to-verify/ for further 
information on how to verify errata reports.

Further information on errata can be found at: 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php.

Thank you.

RFC Editor/rv


> On Jul 26, 2023, at 9:33 AM, RFC Errata System  
> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8995,
> "Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructure (BRSKI)".
> 
> --
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7576
> 
> --
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Michael Richardson 
> 
> Section: 4.3
> 
> Original Text
> -
>   objective-value = text   ; name of the (list of) supported
>; protocols: "EST-TLS" for RFC 7030.
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --
> objective-value = text   ; name of the supported protocols.
> ; e.g., "EST-TLS" for RFC 7030.
> 
> 
> Notes
> -
> This objective does not support a list of supported protocols. 
> The comment in the example might lead people to conclude they can do that.
> 
> Instructions:
> -
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --
> RFC8995 (draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-45)
> --
> Title   : Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructure (BRSKI)
> Publication Date: May 2021
> Author(s)   : M. Pritikin, M. Richardson, T. Eckert, M. Behringer, K. 
> Watsen
> Category: PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source  : Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach
> Area: Operations and Management
> Stream  : IETF
> Verifying Party : IESG
> 

___
Anima mailing list
Anima@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima