Hello,
In a private thread on teap-brski the topic of co-location of the
TEAP server
and the BRSKI registrar was brought up. It was suggested that the
discussion
move to these lists to get more input from the experts.
In draft-lear-eap-teap-brski-02 the architecture shows a the TEAP
Hi Michael,
Why can't the RA signal to the CA whatever things it things should
be included in the CA, in addition to the goo provided in the client's
CSR? If the Registrar knows the name then why can't it provide it to
the CA. It will be providing the CSR to the CA, on behalf of the client,
On 8/30/21 12:21 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
Dan Harkins wrote:
> Why can't the RA signal to the CA whatever things it things should
> be included in the CA, in addition to the goo provided in the client's
I don't know. Why can't it? What protocol can it use that i
Hello,
On 9/3/21 10:00 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
I'm unclear if CMP allows for a standardized way to override the CSR
contents, or if it simply provides more authority for the RA to create a new
CSR of its own.
Well not really override, more like augment. As I understand it, the
