Thanks Esko,
I just merged a PR to address these:
https://github.com/anima-wg/brski-cloud/issues/40
Thanks,
Owen
-Original Message-
From: Anima On Behalf Of Esko Dijk
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2023 9:01 AM
To: Sheng Jiang ; Brian E Carpenter
; Brian Carpenter ;
Toerless Eckert
Cc:
-Original Message-
From: internet-dra...@ietf.org
Sent: 25 September 2020 00:08
To: Michael Richardson ; Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
; Owen Friel (ofriel)
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-friel-anima-brski-cloud-03.txt
A new version of I-D, draft-friel-anima-brski-cloud-03.txt
has been
Hi Sheng,
Could I request 2 slots:
Slot 1:
Name: BRSKI Cloud Registrar
Draft: draft-friel-anima-brski-cloud
Time: 15 mins
Presenters: Owen Friel / Michael Richardson
Slot 2:
Name: ACME Integrations
Drafts: draft-friel-acme-integrations, draft-friel-acme-subdomains
Time: 10 mins
Presenter:
As requested:
https://github.com/upros/brski-cloud/blob/master/draft-friel-anima-brski-cloud.md
is not published yet. It provides more details on how a BRSKI vendor default
cloud registrar works, and lists a few options for redirect from cloud to prem.
Some of the options also require voucher
-Original Message-
From: Iot-onboarding On Behalf Of Toerless
Eckert
Sent: 12 August 2019 19:50
To: Jack Visoky
Cc: Michael Richardson ; Randy Armstrong (OPC)
; anima@ietf.org; iot-onboard...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Iot-onboarding] [Anima] EXTERNAL: Re: OPC and BRSKI
Agreeing to
FYI, Its up on github now:
https://github.com/upros/brski-cloud
From: Anima On Behalf Of Owen Friel (ofriel)
Sent: 06 August 2019 14:05
To: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef ; anima@ietf.org;
iot-onboard...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Anima] [Iot-onboarding] Device Certificate Deployment Automation
with ACME
Hi guys,
After the meeting and from corridor conversations with Toerless, I had actually
already started on such a draft.
What I have started so far is attached. Its not on a public repo yet, but will
put it there. You are already named on it Rifaat, happy to add you too Michael
and you can
-Original Message-
From: Anima On Behalf Of Michael Richardson
Sent: 03 July 2019 23:28
To: anima@ietf.org; Owen Friel (ofriel)
Cc: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
Subject: Re: [Anima] FW: New Version Notification for
draft-friel-acme-integrations-01.txt
Owen Friel (ofriel) wrote
-
From: internet-dra...@ietf.org
Sent: 02 July 2019 19:50
To: Richard Barnes ; Owen Friel (ofriel)
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-friel-acme-integrations-01.txt
A new version of I-D, draft-friel-acme-integrations-01.txt
has been successfully submitted by Owen Friel and posted
Hi,
I would like a time slot for:
Name of time slot: BRSKI / Afternoon session I
Name of draft(s): draft-friel-acme-integrations
Time requested: 10 mins
Presenter name(s): Owen Friel
And the draft covers how to potentially integrate BRSKI with ACME.
Owen
From: Anima On Behalf Of Sheng Jiang
-Original Message-
From: Emu On Behalf Of Dan Harkins
Sent: 06 June 2019 15:13
To: anima@ietf.org; e...@ietf.org
Subject: [Emu] teap-brski
Hello,
In a private thread on teap-brski the topic of co-location of the TEAP server
and the BRSKI registrar was brought up. It was
-Original Message-
From: Anima On Behalf Of Anoop Kumar Pandey
Sent: Thursday 19 July 2018 05:53
To: 'Michael Richardson'
Cc: 'Toerless Eckert' ; anima@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Anima] Revision of scope of MASA in the BRSKI - Reg
>Presenting a certificate of another party doesn't work.
-Original Message-
From: Toerless Eckert
Sent: Sunday 15 July 2018 18:34
To: Eliot Lear
Cc: Owen Friel (ofriel) ; Michael Richardson
; anima@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Anima] Revision of scope of MASA in the BRSKI - Reg
Eliot:
I think you're trying this type of bootstrap:
https
-Original Message-
From: Anima On Behalf Of Toerless Eckert
Sent: Tuesday 17 July 2018 00:30
To: Owen Friel (ofriel)
Cc: Michael Richardson ; anima@ietf.org; Eliot Lear
Subject: Re: [Anima] Revision of scope of MASA in the BRSKI - Reg
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 08:01:23PM +, Owen
-Original Message-
From: Brian E Carpenter
Sent: Saturday 14 July 2018 16:20
To: Eliot Lear ; Owen Friel (ofriel) ; Eliot
Lear ; Michael Richardson ;
anima@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Anima] Revision of scope of MASA in the BRSKI - Reg
On 15/07/2018 02:47, Eliot Lear wrote:
> Br
I think its more accurate to state:
“What a CUSTOMER wants to avoid is a pledge joining a network where the MASA
just does the logging and does no validation, without any other means to
determine that the device is on the correct network.” E.g. I plug in a wi-fi
device and it connects to the
-Original Message-
From: Michael Richardson [mailto:mcr+i...@sandelman.ca]
Sent: Thursday 15 February 2018 22:12
To: Owen Friel (ofriel) <ofr...@cisco.com>
Cc: Toerless Eckert <t...@cs.fau.de>; anima@ietf.org; Max Pritikin (pritikin)
<priti...@cisco.com>; Elio
Inline Toerless.
-Original Message-
From: Toerless Eckert [mailto:t...@cs.fau.de]
Sent: Thursday 15 February 2018 22:44
To: Owen Friel (ofriel) <ofr...@cisco.com>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>; anima@ietf.org; Max Pritikin
(pritikin) <priti...@cisco.c
(some context - I've been talking internally to Max and Eliot about this quite
a bit)
First, a high level summary of 802.11u-2011 (which is incorporated into
802.11-2016) capabilities.
STAs and APs advertise support for 802.11u by setting the Interworking bit in
the Extended Capabilities IE,
19 matches
Mail list logo
