peter van der Stok <stokc...@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> section 6, leaf prior-signed-voucher, at the end:
> The MASA SHOULD remove all "prior-signed-voucher".
> I would encourage a "MUST" instead of a "SHOULD" when thinking of
> transporting vouchers over constrained networks.
I believe that users of vouchers over constrained networks will want to
"sub-class" the voucher. (I'm sure that's the wrong YANG term)
There will be an example of how to do this in BRSKI, so we don't need to do
that.
> Hope this helps
It does. Also proves you read every word.
We also accept patches via github :-)
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list Anima@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
