Hi Carsten,
On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 03:10:43PM +0200, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> Whether anyone whose statements you are willing to base your
> authorization on is willing to endorse the manufacturer’s claims is
> one of the authorization questions hidden in attestation…
As I understand there can
Carsten Bormann wrote:
>> the manufacturer has all the golden values (the endorsements).
> The manufacturer may have the reference measurements. Whether anyone
> whose statements you are willing to base your authorization on is
> willing to endorse the manufacturer’s claims is
On 2023-07-23, at 06:48, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> the manufacturer has all the golden values (the endorsements).
The manufacturer may have the reference measurements.
Whether anyone whose statements you are willing to base your authorization on
is willing to endorse the manufacturer’s
Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ams=FCss?= wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 02:35:09PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
>> So draft-ietf-anima-constrained-voucher, has some optimizations that
>> can sometimes let the pledge skip the /crts, but why is that
>> interaction so expensive?
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 02:35:09PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
> So draft-ietf-anima-constrained-voucher, has some optimizations that can
> sometimes let the pledge skip the /crts, but why is that interaction so
> expensive?
> Note that in lake-authz, the voucher isn't actually sent, rather
Christian Amsüss wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 05:52:30PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
>> IN section 1.1, without having given a picture of what you are doing
>> you start to say: "The alternative to this constraint is to declare
>> this a blob" and this is really
Hello Michael,
(Group(s): See especially PS at the bottom)
thanks for your feedback, that's the very kind I was hoping for.
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 05:52:30PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
> IN section 1.1, without having given a picture of what you are doing
> you start to say:
>
Hi Christian, I'm excited by your document.
First some editorial suggestions. IN section 1.1, without having given a
picture of what you are doing you start to say:
"The alternative to this constraint is to declare this a blob"
and this is really distracting to understanding what you
