Ivaylo wrote:
>> Given that draft-ietf-anima-constrained-voucher is past WGLC, I
{mcr: it's not past WGLC}
>> personally don't see any problem to add it to the initial SID range
>> allocations (sec 6.3.3) with a new range (as IANA is not responsible
>> for the mega range that you have mentioned). That being said, I want
>> to be sure that the SID draft will not be delayed in case that draft
>> is delayed for any reason, so maybe we will need to discuss.
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> I have opened a github issue against the draft asking for the
> allocation to be included. I'd like to get the running code updated
> ASAP with the new values, and we'll have to respin our document and
> build new sid files.
I meant to paste this, but I hit send instead:
https://github.com/core-wg/yang-cbor/issues/11
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list Anima@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
