sday, May 30, 2023 18:47
To: Srihari Raghavan (srihari) mailto:srih...@cisco.com>>;
anima@ietf.org <mailto:anima@ietf.org>; jabir Mohammed (jamohamm)
mailto:jamoh...@cisco.com>>; Reda Haddad (rehaddad)
mailto:rehad...@cisco.com>>; Sandesh Rao (sandeshr)
mailto:sande...@cisco
hamm)
mailto:jamoh...@cisco.com>>; Reda Haddad (rehaddad)
mailto:rehad...@cisco.com>>; Sandesh Rao (sandeshr)
mailto:sande...@cisco.com>>
Subject: Re: [Anima] FW: New Version Notification for
draft-mohammed-anima-voucher-security-profile-00.txt
Srihari Raghavan (sri
ichael Richardson
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2023 18:47
To: Srihari Raghavan (srihari) ; anima@ietf.org; jabir
Mohammed (jamohamm) ; Reda Haddad (rehaddad)
; Sandesh Rao (sandeshr)
Subject: Re: [Anima] FW: New Version Notification for
draft-mohammed-anima-voucher-security-profile-00.txt
Srihari Ra
Srihari Raghavan (srihari) wrote:
> Agreed that MASA is the signing authority and the draft is meant to
> convey that the owner can influence the choice by way of parameterized
> inputs to the MASA APIs. So, owner can be presented with a 'security
> profile selector' input via
Hi Michael
Thank you for your time.
Agreed that MASA is the signing authority and the draft is meant to convey that
the owner can influence the choice by way of parameterized inputs to the MASA
APIs. So, owner can be presented with a 'security profile selector' input via
the MASA external
In the ID, you write:
} 5. Changes to Registrar Behavior
} The Registrar is the component that authenticates the pledge, makes
} authorization decisions, and distributes vouchers. If the extensions are
} supported, the Registrar MAY process a security profile selector request from
} owner that
Hi, I'll read your I-D, but:
Srihari Raghavan \(srihari\) wrote:
> 2. This allows the owner to change and
> customize the security posture of the device dynamically and securely
> and under scale. 3. This lets the owner to selectively enable or
> disable each of the underlying
Hi all
Just wanted to bring to your attention, the following Individual IETF draft,
that we believe, best fits under the auspices of the ANIMA WG.
Requesting your time and effort to review the same and provide feedback and
also, to see if other WG participants would be interested in working on
