Eliot Lear wrote:
> I think we’re coming close to needing a bit of a work plan for just the
BRSKI
> documents alone. That is- it’s not just how many documents but which
ones, in
> order to accomplish which functions. At this point, I am presuming that
the
> base document is
Hi Sheng,
> On 16 Mar 2019, at 01:56, Sheng Jiang wrote:
>
> Hi, Eliot,
>
> As you know, the charter text is different from the milestones. In charter
> text, we will have a paragraph to describe the BRSKI relevant works. In
> principle, all BRSKI works, even those have not been mentioned,
Eckert
; anima@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Anima] Potential Milestones for ANIMA new charter
Hi Sheng,
Forgive me, but I believe that the charter text above the milestones needs a
touch up. I also see somewhere around six drafts worth of BRSKI work coming
down the pike on their own
Hi Sheng,
Forgive me, but I believe that the charter text above the milestones needs a
touch up. I also see somewhere around six drafts worth of BRSKI work coming
down the pike on their own. They are:
draft-ietf-anima-constrained-voucher
draft-ietf-anima-contrained-voucher
Hi, Toerless,
I am working on the charter text. It is not difficult to categetied the work
items into 4 classes: ANI+, ASA, BRSKI, Use cases. I am intending to put NOCs
into ANI+. I will send you a reword version on next Monday.
For milestones, giving that we have a long document waiting list
