Hi Toreless,
see below.
> Am 01.02.2018 um 19:22 schrieb Toerless Eckert :
>
> Inline
>
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 02:42:29PM +0100, Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) wrote:
>> HI Toerless,
>>
>> thanks so much for these edits. Unfortunately I have one more question. And
>> sorry again for the delay.
>>
Hi Spencer,
see below
> Am 01.02.2018 um 21:21 schrieb Michael Richardson :
>
>
> Spencer Dawkins at IETF wrote:
>> This is Mirja's Discuss thread, and MPTCP is her working group, and
>> she knows MPTCP better than I do, but I'm confused about one thing, as
>> I'm reading this discussion ...
>
Hi Michael,
see below.
> Am 01.02.2018 um 21:19 schrieb Michael Richardson :
>
>
> Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) wrote:
>> see below.
>
>>> Am 01.02.2018 um 16:31 schrieb Michael Richardson :
>>>
>>>
>>> Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) wrote:
Why does your case 2 need an MPTCP connection instead of
Hi Toerless,
see below again.
> Am 01.02.2018 um 20:30 schrieb Toerless Eckert :
>
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 05:14:58PM +0100, Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) wrote:
>>> If all data-plane flows fail, then it might suspend traffic.
>>
>> That will not happen with MPTCP; it will fail back to use the ACP
